The Biggest Trucking Personal Injury Verdicts of 2026 (So Far)

2026 has already produced several massive settlements, including a record-breaking verdict in Utah that stands as the largest civil verdict in the state's history. Below are the biggest trucking personal injury and wrongful death verdicts of the year to date, ranked by size and linked to the news coverage. 

1. Madsen v. Beacon Roofing Supply - $81 Million (Utah, March 2026)

On March 13, a Provo jury awarded $81 million to the family and friends of Michael Madsen, a 12-year-old boy killed in December 2018 while lawfully crossing Pleasant Grove Boulevard in a marked crosswalk. Michael had the walk signal when a day cab pulling a flatbed trailer for Allied Building Products, owned by Beacon Roofing Supply, turned right without coming to a full stop and struck him, feet away from the two friends walking home with him from the movies. The lawsuit alleged the company hired a driver with a documented history of serious traffic violations, including multiple tickets for driving more than 20 mph over the speed limit and driving on a suspended license. The jury awarded $33 million to each parent and $7.5 million to each of the two friends who witnessed the crash, in what attorneys believe is the largest jury verdict in Utah history - all the more striking because a first trial had ended in a defense verdict before the result was overturned. The parties reached a confidential settlement that supersedes the award and precludes appeal, with the payment reportedly covered in full by insurance.

2. Perrigo v. Fames Transport - $52.1 Million (California, June 2026)

A Los Angeles Superior Court jury awarded $52.1 million to Chad Perrigo and his wife after a 2021 collision in Santa Clarita in which a big rig turned left directly into the path of Perrigo's motorcycle, leaving him with severe, life-altering injuries. What makes the case significant beyond its size is the liability chain: the truck's driver was working for Montecristo Trucking, an independent contractor hauling mail under a subcontract from Fames Transport, which itself held the work under a contract that originated with the U.S. Postal Service. The jury found the companies responsible anyway - a warning to carriers that subcontracting work to owner-operators doesn't automatically insulate them from what those drivers do on the road. The verdict included $6.5 million in punitive damages on top of $45.6 million in compensatory damages, after the defense's insurer initially offered nothing and claimed the driver was an independent contractor.

3. Mick v. OPG Logistics - $49 Million (Texas, May 2026)

An Ector County jury awarded $49 million to the family of Steffan Mick, a 29-year-old husband and father of two who was killed in January 2025 when an OPG Logistics 18-wheeler turned left across his path on FM 307 near Midland. Mick was driving home from work, within the speed limit, with his seatbelt on; jurors found the driver failed to yield the right of way and made an unsafe left turn, and that both the driver and the company were grossly negligent. The verdict comprised $40.5 million in compensatory damages - 65 percent assigned to the company, 35 percent to the driver - plus $8.5 million in punitive damages. There's a sobering postscript, though: FreightWaves could find no active federal registration for the carrier, raising real questions about how much of the award the family will ever collect beyond whatever insurance the company carried.

4. Deleston v. TDC Transportation - $8.64 Million (Florida, May 2026)

A Flagler County jury awarded $8.64 million to Jo'Relle Deleston, a former truck driver and Army veteran whose rig was struck on I-95 near Palm Coast in October 2022 when another commercial truck drifted off the road, then corrected hard back into his lane — flipping Deleston's truck several times. Dashcam footage captured the entire sequence, along with the good Samaritans who ran across the highway to help him. Deleston suffered a broken neck among multiple injuries, lost his driving career, and testified that the crash still shapes how he drives and lives; his attorneys keep the dashcam video frozen just before impact because watching it in full triggers his PTSD. The verdict landed against both the at-fault driver and TDC Transportation, reinforcing that carriers are responsible for the drivers they put on the road.

Patterns in 2026's Verdicts

Three themes run through this year's cases. The first is corporate accountability over driver error: in Madsen, Mick, and Perrigo alike, juries assigned the majority of fault not to the person behind the wheel but to the companies that hired, supervised, or contracted for them - negligent hiring, absent safety programs, and subcontracting chains all featured prominently. The second is the collection problem: the year's biggest verdict was superseded by a confidential settlement, and its third-biggest was entered against a carrier that may no longer exist, a recurring feature of trucking litigation where some of history's largest awards were levied against defunct one-truck operations. The third is video evidence: onboard and dashcam footage was central in nearly every case, turning disputed sequences of events into something jurors could watch for themselves. For carriers, the message of 2026 so far is consistent with the broader trend - the median nuclear trucking verdict has roughly tripled since 2020.

‍