What Is Medical Record Review?

Medical record review is the process of collecting, analyzing, and summarizing a patient’s healthcare history from multiple medical documents. This includes physician notes, hospital records, diagnostic test results, treatment plans, and billing statements. Attorneys, insurance companies, and healthcare providers use medical record reviews to understand the full scope of a patient’s medical journey, identify important events, and support decision-making.

Reviewers also focus in on developing narratives for the particular case. Were there gaps in medical treatment? Did the patient have a back injury before the car accident?

In the legal field - especially personal injury, medical malpractice, and workers’ compensation - accurate medical record review is essential. These cases often involve hundreds or even thousands of pages of records spread across multiple providers. A thorough review can reveal key details like the onset of injuries, treatment timelines, and the cost of care. This information can directly impact case valuation, negotiations, and trial strategy.

Traditionally, medical record review is a manual process handled by legal assistants, nurse paralegals, or third-party review companies. Some AI medical record review tools have recently been released to assist these reviewers by automatically creating medical record chronologies.

Why Medical Record Review Matters

Medical records are more than just a compilation of doctor’s notes - they are the backbone of evidence in many legal, insurance, and healthcare contexts. The way they are reviewed can determine whether a case wins or loses, whether a claim is approved or denied, and whether a patient receives the right care.

For attorneys, a properly reviewed medical record can be the deciding factor in proving causation, establishing damages, and persuading a jury. In insurance, it can mean catching inconsistencies or confirming that treatment was medically necessary. For healthcare providers, it’s a way to audit care quality, ensure compliance, and improve patient outcomes.

Because of this importance, the review process needs to be both thorough and efficient. Missing a single entry in a medical record could mean overlooking a crucial symptom, a change in treatment, or a link between an event and an injury.

The Traditional Process

Historically, medical record review has been carried out entirely by human professionals. Attorneys or their staff request records from every provider the client has seen, sometimes spanning years of treatment. These records often arrive in mixed formats - paper charts, scanned PDFs, handwritten records, and digital files from electronic health record systems.

The first step is sorting. Pages must be arranged chronologically, duplicates removed, and unrelated information filtered out. After organization comes the reading and annotation stage. This is where reviewers identify diagnoses, procedures, and other relevant details. They often highlight key passages, jot down notes, and extract important dates into a separate timeline.

Finally, the reviewer prepares a summary. This can take the form of a narrative report explaining the medical history or a bullet-point chronology of events. The attorney uses this summary to prepare demand letters, build exhibits for trial, or guide settlement negotiations. While this process works, it is labor-intensive and expensive. For a large case, it’s not uncommon for review costs to run into the thousands of dollars, and turnaround times can stretch into weeks.

The Challenges of Manual Review

Manual medical record review comes with several practical hurdles. The first is the sheer amount of information involved. Complex personal injury or malpractice cases can generate thousands of pages from multiple providers, covering years of appointments, tests, and treatments. Sorting through this volume takes time and careful attention.

Another challenge is inconsistency. Every healthcare provider has their own way of recording information. Some use structured electronic formats, while others rely on scanned handwritten notes. Terminology, abbreviations, and report layouts can vary widely, making it difficult to piece together a complete and accurate picture.

Human error is also a factor. Even highly skilled reviewers can miss a detail when faced with dense documentation and tight deadlines. A single overlooked entry - such as a date of diagnosis or a change in medication - can affect how a case is understood and presented.

Finally, the process is resource-intensive. Conducting a thorough review requires significant staff time and can delay other important work. Outsourcing is an option, but it can be costly, and in-house reviews can strain already busy teams.

How Technology Is Changing the Process

Advances in document processing and artificial intelligence are starting to address many of these challenges. Modern tools can scan large volumes of medical records quickly, identify important events, and organize information into a more accessible format. This reduces the need to manually read through every page just to find key points.

For example, some platforms, like Legalyze.ai, can take thousands of pages of records, extract notable dates and treatments, and place them in chronological order.

A Practical Example

Imagine a law firm receiving over a thousand pages of mixed-format records for a single case. Traditionally, a reviewer might spend a week organizing and summarizing them. With technology-assisted review, the firm could have a preliminary timeline and key points identified within hours, allowing the substantive work of case building to begin much sooner.

The Importance of Security and Compliance

Any system handling medical records must protect patient privacy and comply with relevant regulations, such as HIPAA in the United States. This means using secure data transfer, encrypted storage, and access controls to ensure that sensitive information is only viewed by authorized personnel.

By reducing the time and resources required for medical record review, technology can help legal and healthcare teams manage larger caseloads, respond faster to client needs, and minimize the risk of missing important information. It also creates opportunities for more consistent documentation, which can strengthen case preparation and decision-making.

As these tools evolve, we may see them expand into related areas such as automated analysis of medical imaging, predictive modeling for settlement values, or cross-case comparisons to identify patterns. While human judgment will always be essential, the review process itself is likely to become faster, more consistent, and more data-driven.

‍

‍